Stefan Schulz-Hardt, Felix C Brodbeck, Andreas Mojzisch, Rudolf Kerschreiter, and Dieter Frey (2006)

Group decision making in hidden profile situations: Dissent as a facilitator for decision quality.

Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 91(6):1080-1093.

The effect of diversity in individual prediscussion preferences on group decision quality was examined in an experiment in which 135 three-person groups worked on a personnel selection case with 4 alternatives. The information distribution among group members constituted a hidden profile (i.e., the correct solution was not identifiable on the basis of the members' individual information and could be detected only by pooling and integrating the members' unique information). Whereas groups with homogeneous suboptimal prediscussion preferences (no dissent) hardly ever solved the hidden profile, solution rates were significantly higher in groups with prediscussion dissent, even if none of these individual prediscussion preferences were correct. If dissent came from a proponent of the correct solution, solution rates were even higher than in dissent groups without such a proponent. The magnitude of dissent (i.e., minority dissent or full diversity of individual preferences) did not affect decision quality. The beneficial effect of dissent on group decision quality was mediated primarily by greater discussion intensity and to some extent also by less discussion bias in dissent groups. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Accession Number: 23485190; Schulz-Hardt, Stefan 1; Email Address: schultz-hardt@psych.uni-goettingen.de; Brodbeck, Felix C. 2; Email Address: f.c.brodbeck@aston.ac.uk; Mojzisch, Andreas 3; Kerschreiter, Rudolf 4; Frey, Dieter 4; Affiliations: 1: Georg-August-University Goettingen; 2: Aston University, Birmingham; 3: Georg August-University Goettingen; 4: Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich; Issue Info: Dec2006, Vol. 91 Issue 6, p1080; Thesaurus Term: Group decision making; Thesaurus Term: Organizational behavior; Thesaurus Term: Teams in the workplace; Subject Term: Social groups; Subject Term: Dissenting opinions (Law); Subject Term: Psychology; Subject Term: Discussion; Subject Term: Homogeneity; Subject Term: Characters & characteristics; Author-Supplied Keyword: dissent; Author-Supplied Keyword: group decision making; Author-Supplied Keyword: hidden profile; Author-Supplied Keyword: information pooling; Author-Supplied Keyword: minority influence; Number of Pages: 14p; Document Type: Article

Artikelaktionen